<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JohnBs personal blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://john.beynon.org.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk</link>
	<description>Confessions of a code Junkie, thoughts on life and anything else i fancy!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>freshairapps.com &#8211; well done Adobe!</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/07/07/freshairappscom-well-done-adobe/</link>
		<comments>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/07/07/freshairappscom-well-done-adobe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/07/07/freshairappscom-well-done-adobe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another sterling effort from the legal team at Adobe claiming that the domain name infringes on their ‘Adobe AIR’ trademark.
You can read more from James on the site at http://freshairapps.com/
Can’t they see that all the guy was doing was promoting AIR applications? Heck the guy doesn’t even have any advertising on the site! 
Well done [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another sterling effort from the legal team at Adobe claiming that the domain name infringes on their ‘Adobe AIR’ trademark.</p>
<p>You can read more from James on the site at <a href="http://freshairapps.com/" title="http://freshairapps.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/freshairapps.com');">http://freshairapps.com/</a></p>
<p>Can’t they see that all the guy was doing was promoting AIR applications? Heck the guy doesn’t even have any advertising on the site! </p>
<p>Well done Adobe! Another prize cock up and doing yourself no favours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/07/07/freshairappscom-well-done-adobe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Start rewriting your email address test regex&#8217;s!</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/26/start-rewriting-your-email-address-test-regexs/</link>
		<comments>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/26/start-rewriting-your-email-address-test-regexs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/26/start-rewriting-your-email-address-test-regexs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it seems in their wisdom ICANN has voted to relax the strict rules on the top level domains, ie .com, .uk etc meaning now that anything could become a tld, so I could register a domain ‘bah’ – so my web address could be http://foo.bah (as long as I can show a business plan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it seems in their wisdom ICANN has voted to relax the strict rules on the top level domains, ie .com, .uk etc meaning now that anything could become a tld, so I could register a domain ‘bah’ – so my web address could be <a href="http://foo.bah" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/foo.bah');">http://foo.bah</a> (as long as I can show a business plan and technical capacity???? That’s some requirement!!!)</p>
<p>Great idea – but what about email addresses? – Of course I’ll want to use my shiney new domain to host my email and I’ll want it to be <a href="mailto:foo@bah">foo@bah</a> – I bet there’s not a single site out there that would let me register with that as my email address – let alone mail server/application that let’s me set that as my email alias!</p>
<p>Better get on with fixing it guys, it’s going to be here next year!</p>
<p> <a title="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7475986.stm" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7475986.stm" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/news.bbc.co.uk');">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7475986.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/26/start-rewriting-your-email-address-test-regexs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My vote for a CF staging license</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/26/my-vote-for-a-cf-staging-license/</link>
		<comments>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/26/my-vote-for-a-cf-staging-license/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ColdFusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/26/my-vote-for-a-cf-staging-license/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to add my vote for the requirement of a ColdFusion staging license. Yes we have the developer license for local development but for a none forward facing staging server it’s often not practical to use the development edition due to the IP restrictions. 
Whilst we have full licenses for our staging server currently, they’re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to add my vote for the requirement of a ColdFusion staging license. Yes we have the developer license for local development but for a none forward facing staging server it’s often not practical to use the development edition due to the IP restrictions. </p>
<p>Whilst we have full licenses for our staging server currently, they’re mostly wasted because we don’t have sites in ‘staging status’ all the time but when we do we may have more than one so can’t get away with using the developers version.</p>
<p>Plus, when it comes to upgrading our production CF licenses we end up having to purchase two licenses (ok, Adobe may like this) one for our live environment and one to keep staging at the same level as production.</p>
<p>Maybe throw a popup after a certain number of page requests, insert text into the html stream, limit the number of page requests then require a CF restart, watermarking seems an obvious choice but that sometimes messes with xml/json packets etc being generated. Or how about, if we could purchase additional IP blocks for a nominal amount? That way we could buy an additional 5 IP block and add that to the development version giving us 7 IPs.</p>
<p>But please Adobe, here the pleas for some kind of staging server license!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/26/my-vote-for-a-cf-staging-license/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMW M3 more economical than a Prius!</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/24/bmw-m3-more-economical-than-a-prius/</link>
		<comments>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/24/bmw-m3-more-economical-than-a-prius/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/24/bmw-m3-more-economical-than-a-prius/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top Gear returned to our screens on Sunday night with many stories about the current fuel prices. In one of the stories the fuel economy of a 4 lt BMW M3 was pitched again a 1.5lt Toyota Prius. Each car had to do 10 laps of the track, the Prius was at full bore whilst [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top Gear returned to our screens on Sunday night with many stories about the current fuel prices. In one of the stories the fuel economy of a 4 lt BMW M3 was pitched again a 1.5lt Toyota Prius. Each car had to do 10 laps of the track, the Prius was at full bore whilst the BMW had to remain behind the Prius – it turns out that the BMW is more fuel economical than the Prius! Not to mention the enormous distances the materials that go into the Prius travel.</p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:5e5cdb4e-7535-43a4-afc1-b8323fab6970" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; float: none; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">
<div><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PP6fe6i1vaY"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PP6fe6i1vaY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/24/bmw-m3-more-economical-than-a-prius/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla Weave first look</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/23/mozilla-weave-first-look/</link>
		<comments>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/23/mozilla-weave-first-look/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/23/mozilla-weave-first-look/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Weave is a early prototype framework for Web services integration with the browser”
Certainly that doesn’t give much away about what Mozilla Weave is but it is definitely worth looking at. At it’s roots, Mozilla Weave pretty much does (on the surface) what Google Browser Sync did it terms of allowing you to synchronise/backup multiple Firefox [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Weave is a early prototype framework for Web services integration with the browser”</p>
<p>Certainly that doesn’t give much away about what Mozilla Weave is but it is definitely worth looking at. At it’s roots, Mozilla Weave pretty much does (on the surface) what Google Browser Sync did it terms of allowing you to synchronise/backup multiple Firefox installations, this includes bookmarks, history, cookies, passwords and form data.</p>
<p>Just like Google Browser sync it’s implemented as Firefox addin. On your first sync it’s immediately obvious that it’s different to GBS as the data you store is encrypted with your chosen passphrase, so no-one has access to the data server side. In fact, the server that the data is stored on is just a WebDav server (if you go to <a href="https://services.mozilla.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/services.mozilla.com');">https://services.mozilla.com</a> after you’ve signed up you can browse your directory to see what’s in there) so you can run your own server to store the data. What’s cool about the Mozilla Weave implementation is that you can share your data, i.e. bookmarks with friends/other parties, despite the data being encrypted! There’s not much more detail on this yet, nor looking around in this early version are there any signs of it having being taken advantage of it but it’s going to be in there at some point.</p>
<p>Mozilla Weave is still an early prototype so not all the features are working, I’m going to have it installed in parallel with Foxmarks but I think it’s going to a pretty cool feature of Firefox. I wonder…if the other browsers are extensible could plugins be written to sync the likes of IE/Safari to the same set of data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/23/mozilla-weave-first-look/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Browser Sync RIP</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/18/google-browser-sync-rip/</link>
		<comments>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/18/google-browser-sync-rip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/18/google-browser-sync-rip/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I (and many others I imagine) found to probably be the most useful Firefox tool, Google Browser Sync will not be developed any further - so no Firefox 3 support. 
I had hoped that the Browser Sync team were just being slow off the mark to get a Firefox 3 compatible version out the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I (and many others I imagine) found to probably be the most useful Firefox tool, Google Browser Sync will not be developed any further - so no Firefox 3 support. </p>
<p>I had hoped that the Browser Sync team were just being slow off the mark to get a Firefox 3 compatible version out the door but this now confirms that it&#8217;s a dead project. </p>
<p>There are few alternatives of course, at the minute I&#8217;ve changed over to using <a href="http://www.foxmarks.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.foxmarks.com');">Foxmarks</a> which seems to do a pretty good job. Whilst coming down the pipeline <a href="https://services.mozilla.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/services.mozilla.com');">Mozilla Weave</a> (and <a href="http://labs.mozilla.com/2008/06/weave-status-update/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/labs.mozilla.com');">here</a>) looks like a pretty sweet almost direct replacement for Browser Sync.</p>
<p>Read more <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/06/google-browser-sync-to-be-discontinued.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/googlesystem.blogspot.com');">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/18/google-browser-sync-rip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scotch On The Rocks will return in 2009!</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/06/scotch-on-the-rocks-will-return-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/06/scotch-on-the-rocks-will-return-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ColdFusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/06/scotch-on-the-rocks-will-return-in-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The guys just announced that Scotch on the Rocks will return in 2009! After putting a fake SOTR RIP slide up!!
See you in 2009!!!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guys just announced that Scotch on the Rocks will return in 2009! After putting a fake SOTR RIP slide up!!</p>
<p>See you in 2009!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/06/scotch-on-the-rocks-will-return-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Railo - OS Clarifications &#38; Pricing</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/06/railo-os-clarifications-pricing/</link>
		<comments>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/06/railo-os-clarifications-pricing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ColdFusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/06/railo-os-clarifications-pricing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So just caught up with Gert again, here&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening.
Railo 3.0 Professional will be released FREE.
Railo 3.0 Enterprise will still cost.
Once Railo/JBoss have worked out license implications of their third party party then Railo 3.1 will be fully open sourced (probably by early 2009) therefore FREE. This includes the enterprise version.
Railo/JBoss will offer support programs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So just caught up with Gert again, here&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening.</p>
<p>Railo 3.0 Professional will be released FREE.</p>
<p>Railo 3.0 Enterprise will still cost.</p>
<p>Once Railo/JBoss have worked out license implications of their third party party then Railo 3.1 will be fully open sourced (probably by early 2009) therefore FREE. This includes the enterprise version.</p>
<p>Railo/JBoss will offer support programs for the products</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/06/railo-os-clarifications-pricing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOTR - Day 2 - Keynote, Railo/JBoss</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/05/sotr-day-2-keynote-railojboss/</link>
		<comments>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/05/sotr-day-2-keynote-railojboss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ColdFusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/05/sotr-day-2-keynote-railojboss/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Railo &#38; Redhat? giving keynote.
Railo joins JBoss.org and goes entirely Open Source - that&#8217;s the announcement.
Railo 3.1 Enterprise not open sourcing due to bundled apps - cfdocument, server administrator, Fusion Reactor, Fusion Debug. FusionDebug to be rewritten to support Railo.
Rail 3.1 - Pro and Community merged. No restrictions in use. Unlimited web contexts, admin console [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Railo &amp; Redhat? giving keynote.</p>
<p>Railo joins JBoss.org and goes entirely Open Source - that&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.jboss.org/railo/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.jboss.org');">announcement</a>.</p>
<p>Railo 3.1 Enterprise not open sourcing due to bundled apps - cfdocument, server administrator, Fusion Reactor, Fusion Debug. FusionDebug to be rewritten to support Railo.</p>
<p>Rail 3.1 - Pro and Community merged. No restrictions in use. Unlimited web contexts, admin console (oops, OpenBD!). FREE! Distributed under LGPL2. Redistribution allowed. Support from Railo community.</p>
<p>JBoss downloads, AS - 7,909,747. Hibernate 3,0392,504.</p>
<p>Railo on steroids..integration of Railo with hibernate, JBoss Cache and JBoss Clustering!</p>
<p>&lt;CFDATA /&gt; (only an idea of a tag name!!!) transparent persistence, pk gen, oo query language, j2ee integration, performance, dual layer cache.</p>
<p>JBoss Cache sounds really cool - cachedwithin used in cluster, action would be performed once per cluster&#8230;.not per server.</p>
<p>JBoss clustering provides, fail-over, replication and load balancing out of the box! Automatic &#8216;dancing&#8217; of servers together, they just find each other - zero config!</p>
<p>What else, ESB (SOA Platform) JBPM (Workflow engine) Messaging (JMS broker) maybe&#8230;.</p>
<p>This is all great news for CFML! Adobe, your turn next <img src='http://john.beynon.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/05/sotr-day-2-keynote-railojboss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Railo going Open Source under JBoss</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/05/railo-going-open-source-under-jboss/</link>
		<comments>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/05/railo-going-open-source-under-jboss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ColdFusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/05/railo-going-open-source-under-jboss/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just announced, Railo is going open source and joins JBoss! More to follow from keynote&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just announced, Railo is going open source and joins JBoss! More to follow from keynote&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/06/05/railo-going-open-source-under-jboss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
