<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ColdFusion 8.0.1 EULA Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/04/04/coldfusion-801-eula-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/04/04/coldfusion-801-eula-changes/</link>
	<description>Confessions of a code Junkie and anything else i fancy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:02:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/04/04/coldfusion-801-eula-changes/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2008/4/4/ColdFusion-8.0.1-EULA-Changes#comment-823</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also curious about the number of licenses required for use on EC2.  I&#039;m very interested in using ColdFusion there, but Amazon abstracts away all of the implementation of the virtual machines, and that means I can&#039;t calculate my license needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also curious about the number of licenses required for use on EC2.  I&#8217;m very interested in using ColdFusion there, but Amazon abstracts away all of the implementation of the virtual machines, and that means I can&#8217;t calculate my license needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnb</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/04/04/coldfusion-801-eula-changes/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2008/4/4/ColdFusion-8.0.1-EULA-Changes#comment-782</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s tough....I woudn&#039;t like to offer a suggestion except to license the maximum number of CPUs it&#039;s able to run on. Enterprise license wording is about how many processors the software operates on - different to Standard which is how many processors the software is installed on. I&#039;m only just getting started with EC2 but given the flexibility of it and the unflexibility (although the new changes are very much welcome) of the CF EULA I&#039;m going to be waiting for the Open BlueDragon to play with that up in the cloud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s tough&#8230;.I woudn&#8217;t like to offer a suggestion except to license the maximum number of CPUs it&#8217;s able to run on. Enterprise license wording is about how many processors the software operates on &#8211; different to Standard which is how many processors the software is installed on. I&#8217;m only just getting started with EC2 but given the flexibility of it and the unflexibility (although the new changes are very much welcome) of the CF EULA I&#8217;m going to be waiting for the Open BlueDragon to play with that up in the cloud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Bradford</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/04/04/coldfusion-801-eula-changes/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Bradford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2008/4/4/ColdFusion-8.0.1-EULA-Changes#comment-781</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not aware of a way to know how many physical CPUs CF is running on in an EC2 instance. So how does this new EULA help with EC2 when the software is running?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not aware of a way to know how many physical CPUs CF is running on in an EC2 instance. So how does this new EULA help with EC2 when the software is running?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnb</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/04/04/coldfusion-801-eula-changes/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2008/4/4/ColdFusion-8.0.1-EULA-Changes#comment-780</guid>
		<description>funnily enough i did that immediately after i first posted this - going to get it checked by Adobe first before releasing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funnily enough i did that immediately after i first posted this &#8211; going to get it checked by Adobe first before releasing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RyanTJ</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/04/04/coldfusion-801-eula-changes/#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>RyanTJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2008/4/4/ColdFusion-8.0.1-EULA-Changes#comment-779</guid>
		<description>Adobe, or someone, should make an AIR app for calculating how many licenses you need for a VM setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe, or someone, should make an AIR app for calculating how many licenses you need for a VM setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnb</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/04/04/coldfusion-801-eula-changes/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 14:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2008/4/4/ColdFusion-8.0.1-EULA-Changes#comment-778</guid>
		<description>yep,you got it. 2 quad core&#039;s are 2 physical proccessors so 1 CF license will cover both of them. With Enterprise the VM&#039;s don&#039;t affect license count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep,you got it. 2 quad core&#8217;s are 2 physical proccessors so 1 CF license will cover both of them. With Enterprise the VM&#8217;s don&#8217;t affect license count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary F</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/04/04/coldfusion-801-eula-changes/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 14:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2008/4/4/ColdFusion-8.0.1-EULA-Changes#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Ah, thanks for that, John. So on a server with 2x quad core CPUs I can run 8 VMs with CF on each one and just pay for one Ent license (of 2 cpus).

That works really well for server consolidation and cost saving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, thanks for that, John. So on a server with 2x quad core CPUs I can run 8 VMs with CF on each one and just pay for one Ent license (of 2 cpus).</p>
<p>That works really well for server consolidation and cost saving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnb</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/04/04/coldfusion-801-eula-changes/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 13:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2008/4/4/ColdFusion-8.0.1-EULA-Changes#comment-776</guid>
		<description>Hi Gary,

on a 2 cpu box for CF enterprise you only need to buy 1 box of CF Enterprise - it covers 2 CPUs. The number of VMs is irrelevant when you&#039;re running enterprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gary,</p>
<p>on a 2 cpu box for CF enterprise you only need to buy 1 box of CF Enterprise &#8211; it covers 2 CPUs. The number of VMs is irrelevant when you&#8217;re running enterprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary F</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/04/04/coldfusion-801-eula-changes/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 13:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2008/4/4/ColdFusion-8.0.1-EULA-Changes#comment-775</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an improvement and kudos for Jason and Adobe for listening. But I don&#039;t get this: Enterprise comes with 2 cpu licenses, but is one or two of those cpu licenses consumed for each VM?

e.g. on a 2 cpu box with 4 VMs, does that require 2 or 4 purchases of CF Ent? $8000 x 2 or $8000 x 4?

If it requires 4 purchases then that&#039;s unfair as each VM consumes half a physical cpu, not 2 cpus. Am I off track or is that right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an improvement and kudos for Jason and Adobe for listening. But I don&#8217;t get this: Enterprise comes with 2 cpu licenses, but is one or two of those cpu licenses consumed for each VM?</p>
<p>e.g. on a 2 cpu box with 4 VMs, does that require 2 or 4 purchases of CF Ent? $8000 x 2 or $8000 x 4?</p>
<p>If it requires 4 purchases then that&#8217;s unfair as each VM consumes half a physical cpu, not 2 cpus. Am I off track or is that right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Jo Sminkey</title>
		<link>http://john.beynon.org.uk/2008/04/04/coldfusion-801-eula-changes/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Jo Sminkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2008/4/4/ColdFusion-8.0.1-EULA-Changes#comment-774</guid>
		<description>Well, this probably is going to have more people looking at BlueDragon (and Railo) I think. While certainly it&#039;s understandable that Adobe wants to try and get licenses for every copy of ColdFusion being used, the customers that generally want virtual machines are those that can&#039;t afford their own box, and thus also are going to balk at the pricing of ColdFusion over other options like PHP and .Net. It&#039;s a shame that Adobe can&#039;t see that trying to extract a full license price out of them is simply going to make them go elsewhere. The pricing of Enterprise is so much higher, I&#039;m not sure it would help considering the fairly low number of virtual machines you likely run on a single box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this probably is going to have more people looking at BlueDragon (and Railo) I think. While certainly it&#8217;s understandable that Adobe wants to try and get licenses for every copy of ColdFusion being used, the customers that generally want virtual machines are those that can&#8217;t afford their own box, and thus also are going to balk at the pricing of ColdFusion over other options like PHP and .Net. It&#8217;s a shame that Adobe can&#8217;t see that trying to extract a full license price out of them is simply going to make them go elsewhere. The pricing of Enterprise is so much higher, I&#8217;m not sure it would help considering the fairly low number of virtual machines you likely run on a single box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
