Comments on: what i learnt yesterday: [ ] in CFC return types http://john.beynon.org.uk/2007/09/26/what-i-learnt-yesterday-in-cfc-return-types/ Confessions of a code Junkie and anything else i fancy! Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:02:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: MrBuzzy http://john.beynon.org.uk/2007/09/26/what-i-learnt-yesterday-in-cfc-return-types/#comment-674 MrBuzzy Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:29:03 +0000 http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2007/9/26/what-i-learnt-yesterday:-[-]-in-CFC-return-types#comment-674 I always thought this one was a special directive for returning complex types (arrays of objects) in Web Services and such? Does it really serve any other purpose? I always thought this one was a special directive for returning complex types (arrays of objects) in Web Services and such? Does it really serve any other purpose?

]]> By: Ben Nadel http://john.beynon.org.uk/2007/09/26/what-i-learnt-yesterday-in-cfc-return-types/#comment-673 Ben Nadel Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:17:00 +0000 http://john.beynon.org.uk/index.cfm/2007/9/26/what-i-learnt-yesterday:-[-]-in-CFC-return-types#comment-673 Is this validating that the return object is BOTH an array and that each index contains an object of that type? If so, that seems like a rather expensive validation. Is this validating that the return object is BOTH an array and that each index contains an object of that type? If so, that seems like a rather expensive validation.

]]>