As many of you know, S Isaac Dealey from New Epoch has been publishing a series of articles on his site comparing the various frameworks. In his final article he’s put all the common CF frameworks up against each other, Fusebox3,4 MachII, OnTap. Comparing both an inefficient application and an efficient application (I’m yet to discover the differences) Fusebox 4 has come out on top. Changing the Fusebox4 efficient application from development to production mode halves the response time. This doesn’t come as a real shock but it’s been nice to see some relatively independent tests of the frameworks and the results certainly bode well for Fusebox 4.
There are a number of corrections to the table noteably the XML DTDs for Fusebox4 and Fusedocs do actually exist and Fusebox4 is GOLD not Beta, I’ve sent these to Isaac for inclusion. Also, i feel that Adalon is worth a mention being the first commercial product fully supporting visual design of Fusebox 3 applications. On the whole, nice job and worth a read!
Recent Comments